Thursday, May 24, 2012

Are you a Cumberbitch?


Alexandra Sokoloff

If you know what I’m talking about, you know what I’m talking about.   If you don’t, you’ve somehow been missing out on the biggest thing since Jesus.  I mean, you know, since the Beatles.

So (in honor of the last episode of Season 2 this week) I'd like to talk today about the new Sherlock Holmes.  Those of you who know can just scream and faint in the background, there, while I fill the others in.  And for the hopelessly straight men (you know who you are) you’re just going to have to endure a little erotomania.

Once in a while there is in film or television or music what has become known in technology as a Black Swan.  Something that defies all expectations at the same time meeting all the expectations you never actually knew you had.  And that's a good enough definition for the Masterpiece Mystery! TV series, Sherlock.




The series is brilliant – a redefining of Sherlock Holmes exactly as he would present himself in modern London, complete with e mailing, texting, GPS—and blogging by his faithful Boswell, John Watson, a veteran doctor who was wounded in Afghanistan, just as the original Watson was (I mean, when something is right, it’s right, right?).  And Sherlock is as he is depicted, an unfettered and unrepentant autistic-slash-high-functioning sociopath.

And a rock god.

An unfettered and unrepentant autistic-slash-high-functioning sociopath of a rock god.

The tagline for the show is “Smart is the new sexy.” And that pretty much sums it up.  This is not just a modern imagining of one of the - or is it THE? - world’s most popular and enduring detectives.  It’s a sexual fantasy for smart people.  And may I say it’s about bloody time we got one?

This is the unlikely catnip at the heart of this show:

 

A truly incredibly actor with the unlikely name of Benedict Cumberbatch (who is now banking upwards of hundreds of thousands of dollars, or at least tens of thousands, for every time he was ever called Cumberbitch as a kid. It’s revenge of the geeks in spades).

You really need to see the real-time reactions of women, girls, men, boys, dogs, horses to this actor to understand the physiological phenomenon going on here.  There are fan groups that call themselves Cumberbitches.  There are cat fights over him on Facebook (think Dionysus, Maenads...) Mention his name or the word Sherlock to a girl (or boy) of fifteen or a woman (or man) of fify and you will get the same helpless, delirious giggling.  That’s actually part of the appeal, the group experience, the knowing that you are not the only one dissolving into goo over this man and this show. And if you are not a fan, you might as well move to Antarctica, because you are going to be seeing Cumberbatch in every movie that Hollywood can cram him into for the next fifty years (fortunately, I think he’s beyond smart enough to choose his roles and limit his exposure.)

I admit that I become flushed and breathless when he launches into one of his twenty-pages-in-a-minute and-a-half-monologues about who ate what pastry at which Tube stop after whichever assignation with whatever coworker that is a trademark of the show.  But my actual fantasies about Cumberbatch are not exactly sexual; they’re more about going back to school in lighting design just to be able to properly light the man’s face.  These are the cheekbones that launched a thousand ships. He is literally golden-eyed.  And I say “man”, but one of the guilty pleasures of the show is that this is a thirty-five-year-old man who looks and acts like the world’s most precocious fourteen-year-old; you feel as if you’re committing a felony just watching it.

One of the delicious ironies of the show is that all of this extreme sexual response from TV fans all over the world is occurring over a character who is not only massively socially incompetent but patently asexual.   The character is explicitly referred to as a virgin, although the gay subtext is – not subtextual at all. This is a love story. But still, clearly unconsummated. (Or is it? It's your fantasy, after all...)

All this sexual confusion I think is one of the delights of the show.  It is polymorphous perversity in the flesh. Well, in the flesh on screen. The creators even make Doyle’s Irene Adler character a dominatrix (not the world’s most convincing one, in my opinion, but anything further I could say on the subject will only get me in trouble so I’ll refrain) who is just as fritzed out by Sherlock the virgin as he is by her.

But there's more to it than the sex, I swear. This is a truly perfect melding of an actor and a role.  Cumberbatch is a star, period - I loved him as Stephen Hawking in Hawking, he conveyed not just brilliance but a heartbreaking sweetness and innocence as the young Hawking. But Sherlock is a career-defining role. It reminds me a bit of Cary Grant, before and after Hitchcock got hold of him. Grant was clearly one fine hunk of actor even in the fluffy romantic roles he did early in his career, but it was the darkness and edge and ambiguity that Hitchcock saw and encouraged (or should I say demanded?) in him that made him an iconic, archetypal movie star. (Take a look at Cumberbatch in Masterpiece's pre-Sherlock miniseries The Last Enemy. There are hints of Sherlock, there, in the irritated monologue the character finally explodes into on national television, the kind of monologue that makes you say THERE.  Do THAT. Much more of THAT.  Please forget the love plot and just let this guy talk, and visibly think, on screen.)

Clearly creator/writers (of Dr. Who fame) Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss (who also wonderfully portrays Sherlock’s fussy and hovering older brother Mycroft), have that masterful Hitchcockian understanding of the material and their star. They saw it, and they gave him what he needed.  It's filmmaking collaboration in its most perfected state, the stuff that dreams (and smart people's sexual fantasies) are made on.

The writing is stellar, wicked and joyous and - I'll say it again, unrepentant; I’ve had whole years of my life that haven’t given me as much pleasure as the scene in which Sherlock compulsively corrects a convict’s grammar.

And yes, there is a Team Watson, and I don’t at all mean to give Martin Freeman short shrift; he is the perfect, earthy, touchingly maternal counterpart to Sherlock (talk about catnip, I so LOVE that adenoidal British voice), and I’m also thrilled to have Rupert Graves as Detective Inspector Lestrade.  (Graves is a former punk rocker I’ve adored since he made his sizzling acting debut as little brother Freddy in Merchant/Ivory/Jhabvala’s swoony Room with a View).  I wasn’t quite as thrilled with Andrew Scott as little-boy-psychopath Moriarty in the first season, but he grew on me in season two; there was just a certain way he bared his teeth that was endearing enough to make me stop hating him for the two seconds required to commit to an arch villain.

You’ll notice I’m not expounding on the plot lines (I’m too busy designing lights over here....).  I confess, it’s been a long time since I’ve read anything in the Sherlock canon, but the episodes are surprisingly true to the plot lines of the Sherlock stories I remember from my childhood. The episodes are not strict adaptations, but there are plenty of clever-to-brilliant references and homages for those in the know. The plots work just fine, and there are always wonderful setpieces (the Chinese circus setting in Episode 2(?) is truly dazzling), but it’s the character interaction, chemistry, and the dialogue that provide most of the breathtaking suspense. And to be perfectly honest, I’d have to watch every episode again to be able to focus on the plots because I simply DON'T CARE; I am way too busy being dazzled by - other things (and remember, I TEACH structure,  I’m telling you, this is how bad it is!).

As for social and cultural relevance, Sherlock makes Asperger’s both normal and attractive, which in an age driven by minds like the late Steve Jobs and Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg makes the whole show not just topical but inevitable. There is something uncannily true about the series.  We KNOW this Sherlock; he is the natural, timeless, entirely present-tense incarnation of an immortal character.

He is US.

So— those of you who don’t know Sherlock like I know Sherlock, go treat yourself to a little Holmes crack, available on Netflix and Amazon and iTunes.   I dare you not to get hooked.

And for all you Cumberbitches, pull up a chair, grab the riding crop, slap on a couple of nicotine patches and let’s dish.  What is it about this show?  What does it do for you?

And yes, let's hear about other perfect portrayals of classic characters, too.

- Alex


_________________________________________________
My spooky thrillers The Unseen and Book of Shadows are now available in multiple e versions:

Amazon bestseller! For Kindle, Nook and Smashwords for $2.99

After experiencing a precognitive dream that shatters her engagement and changes her life forever, young California psychology professor Laurel MacDonald decides to get a fresh start by taking a job at Duke University in North Carolina. She soon becomes obsessed with the long-buried files form the world-famous Rhine parapsychology experiments, which attempted to prove if ESP really exists.

As she teams up with another charismatic professor, they soon uncover disturbing reports, including a mysterious case of a house supposedly haunted by a poltergeist, investigated by another research team in 1965. The two professors and two exceptionally gifted Duke students move into the grand, abandoned mansion to replicate the investigation, unaware that the entire original team ended up insane... or dead.

Inspired by the real-life paranormal studies conducted by the world-famous Rhine parapsychology lab at Duke University.

$ 2.99 US, €2.99 Europe. Also available in Amazon's lending library.

Click to download:  

Amazon US
Nook
Amazon UK  (paperback/e book from Little Brown)
Amazon DE
Amazon FR
Amazon ES
Amazon IT

"Destined to become a horror classic." 
- Romantic Times Book Review

"Gave this reviewer a bad night's sleep - what more could you ask of a horror novel?" - SFX

___________________________________________________

Homicide detective Adam Garrett is already a rising star in the Boston police department when he and his cynical partner, Carl Landauer, catch a horrifying case that could make their careers: the ritualistic murder of a wealthy college girl that appears to have Satanic elements.

The partners make a quick arrest when all evidence points to another student, a troubled musician in a Goth band who was either dating or stalking the murdered girl. But Garrett's case is turned upside down when beautiful, mysterious Tanith Cabarrus, a practicing witch from nearby Salem, walks into the homicide bureau and insists that the real perpetrator is still at large. Tanith claims to have had psychic visions that the killer has ritually sacrificed other teenagers in his attempts to summon a powerful, ancient demon.

All Garrett's beliefs about the nature of reality will be tested as he is forced to team up with a woman he is fiercely attracted to but cannot trust, in a race to uncover a psychotic killer before he strikes again.


Amazon bestseller!  $3.99      Also available in Amazon's lending library.

Amazon US
Amazon UK
Amazon DE
Amazon FR
Amazon ES
Amazon IT

"A wonderfully dark thriller with amazing is-it-isn't-it suspense all the way to the end. Highly recommended."   - Lee Child

"Sokoloff successfully melds a classic murder-mystery/whodunit with supernatural occult undertones."  - Library Journal

"Compelling, frightening and exceptionally well-written, Book of Shadows is destined to become another hit for acclaimed horror and suspense writer Sokoloff. The incredibly tense plot and mysterious characters will keep readers up late at night, jumping at every sound, and turning the pages until they've devoured the book."   - Romantic Times Book Reviews, 4 1/2 stars

_________________________________________________

22 comments:

Sarah W said...

Thank you for the nod to Team Watson---and I categorically deny that I only joined to avoid being trampled by the CumberCougars (six years isn't that wide a gap, thanks).

I was a Sherlock fan for decades before this show and I'm so very glad Watson Is finally getting his due. There are self-deprecating hints of Watson's competency in the original stories, but almost none in the movies.

But what does it for me, beyond the mysteries and the unraveling of Sherlock's matrix thinking and Watson's BAMF moments, is the bond between these two different men---one barren, one broken. If this is friendship, then the rest of the world is doing it wrong. They don't always get it right themselves, either, but they're very human and relatively young Archetypes, after all---they haven't quite grown into themselves, yet. But at base, there is trust and the beginnings of absolute trust (though they didn't get that quite right either, at the end of season two).

And I think it's this bond that fascinates people and makes them poke at it (so to speak) on message boards and in fanworks, which overwhelmingly center on their relationship.

It's easy to see that bond as sexual, however unrequited or repressed, because there are so few examples of deeply platonic bonds between men (or a man and a woman) in our cultural schema. And the chemistry between Cumberbatch and Freeman is undeniable . . . Yet, rule 34 aside, the majority of them (and mercy, they are Legion) are about intimacy, not sex---or not only about sex. They examine how these two men compliment and save each other. (I might confess to writing maybe one small story myself . . .maybe).

The interesting thing is, as Watson said---and maybe meant---in the first ep, it's all fine. Everything has been so cleverly set up that anything the viewer sees in the subtext (friends, lovers, brother-in-arms, soulmates, etc.) works within the context on the show.

It's all fine.

(Sorry for the long comment, but it is one of my favorite current obsessions . . . )

Alexandra Sokoloff said...

Right, Sarah, you just keep on denying that.

I'm the last person to think that all intimate bonds have to be sexual. On the other hand, I could equally argue that ALL intimacy IS sexual - people just have such restricted views of sexuality that they don't want to consider that.

But as you say perfectly - it's all fine. And the wide open door to bring our own subtext - it's gold.

About Bobbi C. said...

Yes, what you said! I'm still breathless from the last episode. I missed seeing Mr. Cumberbatch in his previous roles, but will definitely keep an eye on him now. The show has a way of being sexual without really being sexual--if you know what I mean. I just call it the Magic of Moffat/Gattis.

And I'll be darned! I didn't know that the Mycroft character was played by Gattis. Where have I been? LOL

Happy trails! bobbi c.

Alexandra Sokoloff said...

Isn't Gattis wonderful? Love that character. Actor/writers just kill me.

Carolyn J. Rose said...

He's everything we admire in a person and everything that annoys the heck out of us. He's rude, but rude to everyone. He's caught up in himself, but with good reason. And he has a soft spot - his few friendships. I can hardly wait for next season.

Joylene Nowell Butler said...

Oh, what a breath of fresh air, Sherlock is. I watched reruns of Series One 3x, much to the horror of my family. By the time Series 2 began, I wasn't the only one hooked. Now we're scheduling dinner Sunday night so it doesn't interfere with showtime. Great serie, great setting, great actors. I didn't even care when Sherlock showed up just in time to rescuing her from losing her head. Corny, maybe. Wonderful, definitely. Thanks for putting it in proper perspective, Alex. Did anyone ever tell you, you have a wonderful way with words?!

Another great BBC series is Wallander.

Debra Eve | Later Bloomer said...

You've said it all, Alexandra. I couldn't wait for Season 2, so had my in-laws mail it from London. Now the wait begins again, with both actors involved in The Hobbit. Don't know how I'll stand it!

Alexandra Sokoloff said...

Well said, Carolyn! It IS amazingly touching to see him develop those attachments, knowing how they make him vulnerable.

I can't wait, either. (Eighteen MONTHS?)

Alexandra Sokoloff said...

Thanks, Joylene! I didn't care about that fantasy, either. Why not?

Alexandra Sokoloff said...

Debra, the wait is unimaginable, but to fill the time I highly recommend BC in Hawking - a completely different performance, but wonderful - heartbreakingly sweet. Otherwise, well, we must endure...

lil Gluckstern said...

I agree with everything you said. I don't think I qualify s a cougar anymore, but this guy is sexy, and hot, and, well, never mind. I really like the relationship with Watson who study enough to act as a foil for Sherlock. Watching this show is like drinking a glass of fresh water, and you did it great justice.

Alexandra Sokoloff said...

Thanks, Lil, that means a lot!

I am frantically looking for another series to feed my obsession, now. This is how television is SUPPOSED to be. Why is it so rare?

Hannah Y said...

Never mind Cumberbatch's Sherlock, I'm enthralled by your monoblog. What an amazing piece of prose. This is my type of poetry.

In the words of the heroine from the current hot trilogy (that is structured well but needs major editing), "Oh, my!"

I have Sherlock's Season Two on DVR but haven't seen Season One yet. Will have to remedy that soon.

Joanie said...

I can't agree more. I first discovered Cumberbatch in the Masterpiece Mystery offering "Murder is Easy" by Agatha Christie, and became a fan for life. Now, with this new Sherlock I've become a fanatic. My only complaint with this incarnation of "Sherlock" is the same as I have with the "Whitechapel" series starring Rupert Penry-James...I have to wait so long between seasons.

Joanie

leftbrainedwritebrained.wordpress.com

Alexandra Sokoloff said...

Hannah, thank you! If I can please a Sherlock fan with my writing, I'm doing something right!

Alexandra Sokoloff said...

Joanie, thanks for reminding me about Murder is Easy, I've been meaning to get hold of that. Cumberbatch in Christie? What's not to love?

And I'll have to check out Whitechapel. I have a major TV hole in my life to fill.

Barbara Morrison said...

For me it's the intelligence. No lowest common denominator here--keep up or go elsewhere. I also love the inventive ways they've found to show him thinking.

Alexandra Sokoloff said...

Barbara, I'm laughing: "Keep up or go elsewhere," indeed.

You know, there's something I didn't say, too - the TIMING is so perfect - the dialogue, action, character interaction, is all so perfectly paced it makes me realize how rare that is in television.

John Peacock said...

The other thing about Sherlock is that it's a superhero story - The Holmes boys, Moriarty and Irene Adler are superhuman - their supposed handicaps (autism, sociopathy) become super-powers that give them dominance over the ordinary humans, that (at the same time) they regard with slightly jealous incomprehension (for example the conversation between Sherlock and Mycroft after they've identified "Irene's body").

Sort of thing X-Men was going for, though I confess I like Sherlock more.

Alexandra Sokoloff said...

Great point about ordinary human superpowers, John. The original Holmes certainly had exactly that.

I like Sherlock better than X Men, too. Of course X Men is annoying just because of the "Men" in the title, since, you know, they're not. All.

Ellen said...

Alex, You need to know about this:
http://www.nationaltheatre.org.uk/63286/productions/frankenstein.html and what I mean by that is you need to SEE it. Gorgeous, chilling, and will change you a little bit.
You can see BC as the doctor and Jonny Lee Miller as the creature, or vice-versa or (irresistibly) both.
Click on "Venues" and you'll get the when and where.

Alexandra Sokoloff said...

Ellen, thanks SO much for that link. I've been trying to access the site to find out when I can see it but so far it hasn't loaded for me. I'll keep trying, because this is truly unmissable.